Comparison Shopping Engine Strategies

CSE Wishlist - Part 3

This is one that I think CSEs should want to embrace because it is all about communication between the merchants and the consumer.

More/better ways to demonstrate value proposition.

There are already elements in existence that help merchants communicate their value proposition, such as promo text, ratings, logos, and obviously the price of the offer itself. However, many possibilities for improvement remain. These are the ones at the top of my mind:

• Real time promotion messaging: The timing around the display of promotional text is painful. Short promos such as one-day sales are pretty much impossible to get right through the feed. Entering such information through the merchant UI with controls over timing, or timing controls in the feed, would allow merchants to be more confident in presenting short term promotions on CSEs.
• Real time price changes: Same as above for pricing. Some merchants have one hour or two hour price drops that can drive a lot of sales but it's impossible to promote such offers on most CSEs right now. (PriceGrabber already allows this one in the merchant interface under "Click-Thrus by Product")
• Warranty and service options: Merchants could put this sort of information in promo text, but it's not as attractive and would be replaced if they had any real promotions going on. There is value to these options, though, especially on certain product types, so some default indication should be made visible as opposed to just burying the information in the description.
• Configuration/Customization messaging: Obviously this can be included in titles, descriptions, and promo text but it's still hard to get the message to consumers, especially when it applies to all of one's products. For this point and the previous one, a possible method to convey this information would be something akin to the gift icon on eBay (but free).

If anyone else has specific ideas, I'd love to hear about them.

CSE Wishlist - Part 2

As I mentioned in my last post, a major theme in this series is that of control for the merchants. Here is another CSE wishlist item in that vein:

More insight and control over affiliate partner sites.

For those who don't know, some CSEs get a LOT of the traffic for which they charge merchants from affiliate partner sites. For example, PriceGrabber's comparison shopping data is used on CNET and AOL Shopping. Shopping.com has hundreds of partners, and offers both a full API or widgets for the less savvy. There are many more examples, enough to make one's head spin, but that is not the focus here.

As a merchant, it is difficult to know what percent of traffic is coming from these partner sites and whether that traffic is converting. The traffic spikes I mentioned in my last post sometimes blindside not only the merchant but the CSEs themselves because they are the product of promotions run by these partner sites.

Shopping.com has taken a step in the right direction by introducing their Value Based Pricing program, which is intended to offset the lower return delivered by some of these partner sites. The system basically lowers the CPC charged for clicks originating from sites that yield lower conversion rates. Kudos to the SDC team for this innovation, but to the merchant, it is still a black box. Merchants would prefer to be at the helm rather than be reassured that something is being done about it.

I think it is fair to include new merchants in the entire network, but allow them to opt out on the partner level. This is not just a way for merchants to control conversion, but also cut back on spend in lieu of the additional budget controls discussed last time.

I am trying to be realistic about these requests, so it may be more likely that CSEs publish a list of partner sites or maybe report how much traffic comes from the network. Regardless of the details I think any step toward transparency would be welcome, but the ultimate goal should be to allow merchants some level of control.

CSE Wishlist - Part 1

Since it's a new year (almost), I thought it might be a good time to discuss some new features from which merchants would greatly benefit. So to all you CSE product managers out there, tune in over the next week or two. Here is the first request:

More budgeting options.

Most CSEs only offer monthly budget caps, but there is no way to control the rate at which that is spent. Much like AdWords, one or both of the following is needed:

• A function that attempts to balance the spend across the month.
• A daily cap that ensures a set amount is not exceeded for any day.

This would be especially valuable for small/medium-sized merchants who want to test the waters but may have trouble keeping their account active because they can't afford to let it run free. There is no reliable way to forecast what traffic levels will be, even for merchants already live on a particular engine (many CSE's own documentation indicates such). Remove the risk so they feel comfortable.

For larger merchants, this would allow feeds to remain larger and lower the risk of having to go dark at the end of the month/quarter. Since spend velocity is currently dictated exclusively by user behavior and engine/affiliate promotions/merchandising, the only lever the merchant can pull is to remove products from their feed. This is a necessary evil but isn't ideal for merchants, engines or consumers.

Most importantly, this will shield merchants from the dreaded traffic spike. Some engines are more prone to this than others, but at times, merchants will see huge traffic increases for a single day, either on a single product or across a few products. Sales may increase, but often the quality of that additional traffic is poor, so the return on that spend is usually very poor. Such spikes typically result in requests for click cost credits at least and complete feed removal at worst, so no one really wins. Ideally the engines would coordinate the promotions that results in such spikes with merchants before-hand as well, allowing merchants to authorize an override of their daily cap.

I think I know what the CSE folks are muttering right now: "Our system architecture can't support this!" and/or, "This will lower our revenue!" I believe you, but I think if you could work toward this, you would get and retain more merchants, meaning more products/listings/revenue in the long term.

One of the overall themes you will see in this series is that of more control for the merchant. Comparison Shopping is a complicated and sometimes overwhelming channel, one that is often misunderstood. I think the more control merchants have, the more likely they are to try the channel, see some success and therefore continue with it.

Follow up - Holiday Season Approaching: Watch Out for Falling CPCs??

Well, it appears that November 1st has come and gone and Shopping.com is the only Comparison Shopping Engine daring to drop their rates for the Holiday Season.  Other major players still plan to increase their rates (per usual) for the holiday season.  However, Shopzilla is offering a small concession by postponing the rate increase from Nov 1st to Nov 20th - a few extra days is always appreciated.

Regardless I am still interested in how Shopping.com's rate decrease will work for them over the coming 2 months.  Specifically as retailers have come to realize Shopping Engines are a "must have" advertising avenue will they find the extra ads for the same spend on Shopping.com is worth additional attention, or not?  And while budgets may be decreasing with the tight economy we see percent spend on Comparison Shopping Engines remaining steady, regardless of CPC increases or decreases... my guess is none of the major engines will starve, but will Shopping.com thrive?

ChannelAdvisor announces RichFX acquisition!

Today we're excited to announce that ChannelAdvisor has acquired RichFX.   RichFX provides over 200 brand-name retailers (50 in the IR500!) with rich media solutions.  RichFX's solutions have shown they consistently increase a retailer's conversion rate 10%+.

Here are some great examples of what the RichFX solutions are capable of:

• Saks - jewelry example (zoom/pan/multi-image view)
• Saks - shoe example
• Men's Warehouse - Build your own Tux.
• Lillian Vernon - Rich  catalog
• Disney - Custom rich catalog
• Wal-mart - Rich circular

This is just a sampling of the solutions we now will be able to offer.

Why are conversion rates so important?
RichFX marks ChannelAdvisor's first foray into a segment of the market that I call 'conversion enhancers'.  Here's our thinking.  We have litterally hundreds of case studies of improving the GMV via ecommerce channels (search, cse, marketplaces) for retailers.  In every single channel the math is effectively the same for return on spend (ROS):

ROS = revenue/cost

if you want to express this as a 'take rate', it's the inverse:  cost/revenue

Expanding ROS out a bit for pay-per-click (CPC) models you get:

• ROS = rev / cost
• rev = (clicks*CR*AOV) {note: AOV is average order value, or on eBay, ASP as there is no cart.  CR is conversion rate}
• cost = (clicks*cpc)
• OR: ROS = (clicks*CR*AOV) / (clicks*CPC)

The clicks effectively cancel out and you are left with: (CR*AOV)/CPC.

Thus for your average CPC ecommerce channel in addition to the channel optimization that you do (CPC, etc.) the most strategic datapoints you can look at are your CR (conversion rate) and your AOV (average order value).

What happens when conversion rates increase?
In our experience, when a retailer enjoys an increase in conversion rates it dramatically improves not only their ecommerce channel ROI, but it also gives them a competitive advantage.  They have several ways to leverage that advantage.  They can use the improved CR to keep their channel spend the same and increase sales or they can drop the savings to the bottom line.  Most retails use CR improvements to double down on their ecommerce channel spend.

What's this mean for Comparison Shopping Engines?
One of the intriguing things to us about the RichFX acquisition is previously this technology was limited to only the websites of retailers.  Retailers spend tons of time and $ in their digital assets, and then when they put their products on CSEs, they are many time stuck with a flat stock-image that is usually teeny tiny.  Here's an example of a boot search on shopzilla.

Imagine you are a boot retailer and you have implemented some really nice rich media on your website. What if you could syndicate that to the CSE and have that same rich experience happen at the CSE? Your clicks would naturally convert better and you'll effectively leverage the merchandising experience throughout your channels vs. limiting it to just your website.

Of course its going to take a while for us to realize this vision, but thanks to RichFX, we are pretty close to having the pieces needed to make this happen.

Closing it out with a conversion rate example

Let's say there's a retailer - RetailerX that is doing some  CPC via CSE.  Their conversion rate is 3.5% and their AOV is $100. RetailerX is paying $.50/click and they get 5000 clicks/month for a particular product.

Their ROS is: revenue /cost

• Revenue = clicks*CR*aov = 5000*3.5%*$100 = $17,500
• cost = clicks*CPC = $2,500
• ROS = rev/cost = 17500/2500 = 7
• Or take rate is = cost/rev = 14.29%

Now the retailer works on improving their CR via some rich media (Note: Rich Media  can also improve your AOV - see the tux builder, but for this example let's just focus on CR).  The retailers is able to improve their CR 10% (from 3.5% to 3.85%)

• Revenue = 5000*3.85%*$100 = $19,250
• cost = $2,500
• ROS = 7.7
• or take rate is = 12.98%

With this example you can see that the retailer is now able to effectively get 10% more out of that $2500 spend.  If the retailer is managing their ecommerce channel via an effective take rate and their margins support 15%, then the 13% take rate for this product now gives the retailer the ability to either pocket that 2% as extra margin, or to increase their CPC, which would give them more clicks and thus more volume of sales for the same effective take rate.

Want to learn more?
If you have any questions about how Rich Media can improve your sales, we're hosting a webinar next week, July 23 at 3pm ET, you can register here.  Alternatively feel free to leave a comment or contact your rep at ChannelAdvisor for more details.

Is there a method to Microsoft's cashback madness?

Microsoft acquired the Jellyfish CSE and has used it as the core of their rebate program.  Pundits have dismissed this as futile, but over at eBay Strategies, we have some new information and thoughts that could change your opinion.

More m-commerce ramblings

Our friends over at ReadWriteWeb attending Internet Retailer today caught a relevant talk by Nic Covey, Director of Insights for Nielsen Mobile detailing trends in "m-commerce" and outlining some good data points.

To me, there are two distinct version of mobile commerce:

1. SMS purchasing
2. Purchasing through the mobile browser

SMS purchasing is meant to capture the impulse buy in all of us, and surely we've all seen those late-night low-budget commercials to buy ringtones via SMS.  But this innovation has made its way to places like Papa John's, Tim McGraw concerts, CosmoGirl and Stuff (which printed shortcodes next to products), and even Amazon and American Eagle.

But there's also another use case, and that's to cement brand recognition and tie-in.

In Amazon's particular case, TextBuyIt allows one to send keywords to Amazon's shortcode (262966), reply with "1" or "2" to buy an item from returned results, and answer a call confirming details.  Amazon then associates your phone number with your 1-Click settings or your email address and shipping information.

One thing that Amazon's particular case serves is comparison shopping on the road without massive graphical overhead.  It's simple and direct and cements Amazon as the "go-to" for price checks.

American Eagle is doing this to drive in-store traffic, which lets you text yourself items from their e-commerce storefront to find the physical item in your local store.

As for mobile browsing, Nielsen says that 9 million people have used their phone to browse the Web and purchase things (RWW indicates that this is only 3.6 percent of mobile phone subscribers) -- which is paltry in comparison to the ~150mm+ online shoppers.

But it's a growing segment, which increased by 73 percent alone since last April. 

So I'm curious, if you're reading this far, have you ever bought something using your phone?  If so, tell everyone what it is you bought and why you used mobile in the comments.

written by Scott Hurff -- scott.hurff at channeladvisor

Live blogging from Internet Retailer Conference

Here at IRCE, I'm in a workshop around affiliates and along with 80% of the attendees, I'm sitting here with my jaw open because instead of offering ways to maximize your affiliate business, this workshop has essentially been a 90 minute rant about what scum-bags affiliates are and tons of data that are essentially telling retailers to scale back or do extreme policing of their affiliate programs.

Why the anti-affiliate sentiment?
I decided to cover this topic on CSE strategies, because with ChannelAdvisor's ShoppingAdvisor product, we've seen more and more retailers going direct with their top affiliates, and keeping the bottom-tier affiliates in affiliate networks for closer management.  Retailers seem to be separating the wheat from the chaff.

Barbara Hurd from Harry and David talked about how they are fighting affiliates that are doing bad things like saying they have a H+D coupon code, but then send people to competitor's sites.

Vickie Updike from Miles Kimball - pointed to some research they did that showed affiliate drove only 17% NEW orders for them.  In other words, 83% of the affiliate orders were essentially coming to MK were intercepted and MK had to effectively pay for orders they would have gotten anyway.

George Michie went on a rampage and talked about the bad guys and their tricks such as:

• PPC fiends - these guys violate your affiliate rules and do things like buy your keywords at night (night pirates), or use geo targeting to avoid your corp HQ and buy in other regions.  You can catch these, but it's tough.
• Coupon sites - these guys are trained by the consumer press (today show mentioned twice - evidently Matt Lauer is big on coupons)
• Domain squaters - they buy things like plasmatvs.com and do lots of SEO and then charge for traffic to a bunch of affiliates.
• Loyalty programs - eBates kind of programs essentially want to take an affiliate % from traffic you should be getting - avoid them.

What's a retailer to do?
At the end of the day, the panel seemed to be saying that it's time to drop the hammer on affiliate programs, cull out the bad guys and focus more on Web 2 kinds of activities like blogs, user-generated-content, etc.

On the culling side, one of the panelists likened finding your 'good affiliates' like trying to find the good guys in prison.

Ouch - nuff said.

Stylefeeder: one million Facebook installs

Has Stylefeeder just proven that e-commerce can live inside Facebook?

Stylefeeder, a Boston-based social shopping site centered around a recommendation and rating algorithm dubbed the Maximum Margin Matrix Factorization, just passed the million-member mark with its Facebook app.

The gist of the app is this: it connects to your Stylefeeder account and syncs your "shopping finds" between the two properties.  Your picks then display on your profile box while incoming product recommendations stream to you from within the app.

In effect, it replicates the experience you'd find on the main property within Facebook. 

It appears that the application has had a positive effect on Stylefeeder's main property, as well, shooting up past ThisNext and 200,000 monthly uniques in February to ~1 million uniques in April, according to Compete.

Stylefeeder's also ahead of Mark Cuban's RadicalBuy (3,000 installs), Amazon's Giver (1,300 installs) and Grapevine (1,000 installs).

written by Scott Hurff -- scott.hurff at channeladvisor

Comparison Shopping Engines @ ChannelAdvisor Catalyst UK

Scot Wingo here.  I'm over in the UK (London) for our ChannelAdvisor Catalyst UK event and we held an interesting panel on CSEs.

In my keynote, I pointed out that based on Comscore data, about 35% of buyers in the EU go through a CSE on a monthly basis.  In the UK, this is quite a bit higher at over 50%.

The panel was hosted by our UK CSE expert, Dan Burnham and featured:

• Adam Patterson, Shopzilla
• Laurent Gibb, Shopping.com
• Thomas Sevege, Twenga

Shopzilla

Shopzilla is active in UK, FR, DE.  They reviewed a timeline of the company that most are familiar with.  In EU, they have 6m visitors/m and in the UK approx 3m uniques/m.

The Shopzilla differences are:

• Speed - 10-50x faster than competitors
  • No ads
• Relevance
  • ShopRank determines most relevant results, not just based on price.
• Ratings (consumer ratings)

They highlighted non-compacted products and how shopzilla does on these items.  Specifically they pull out a variety of attributes.  Used the example of women's jeans.

Shopzilla has a bid-driven interface (merchants love this - we can attest to this).  He also highlighted their account management function.

Shopping.com
Highlighted their distribution network.  Their Catalogue is part of their key differentiator.  They have over 100 people in Isreal actively building the catalog.  He also talked about ratings.

Twenga
Twenga is a new CSE in the UK market.  They have gotten some pretty good traction.  They are only 18 months old.

They are in 11 countries with 30k active members.  Tehy have 60m offers and 90,000 product catalogs.  They claim 12m visits.

They have a mixed crawler/feed model (all inclusive vs. pay only).  It's indexed with TwengaBOC (smart cataloguing).  These products are displayed with Twenga's Clustering algorithm.

Thus their value proposition is:

• For buyers:
  • All merchants - largest selection
  • Finds the right product, at the right price.
• For merchants:
  • CPA model - pay only when something sells
  • Traffic

Here's an example of a search on Twenga.

Comparison Shopping Engines in the UK and Europe

In the EU and specifically the UK, CSEs are even more prevalent, fragmented and strategic than the US.  Here is some data I reviewed in my keynote:

First, here is some Comscore trends and data on CSEs in all of Europe:

Note that 34.7% of internet users visit a CSE in Europe.  Also note that Twenga (CSE 2.0) came on the market with 4m uniques placing them into the top 10 very quickly.  Also, one thing to note as they are coming to the US is that Ciao enjoys the number one spot ahead of many of the CSE 1.0 players like shopping.com and shopzilla.

Second, here is the same Comscore data, but from a UK perspective:

In the UK, note that Shopping.com holds the top spot, but Ciao is right on its heels.  Also of particular interest is that 51.4% of the internet audience (online shoppers) in the UK  visit a CSE on a monthly basis.  So UK buyers are much stronger users of CSEs than both the rest of EU and the US.